- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old- f" n) n5 a; ?2 }6 o
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
2 g" y: k4 [) V4 g6 W9 f0 R. sExposure to Testosterone
" _6 W+ k% B2 J. ~! zSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2/ z% k- ?: P, ^
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD13 w) V) d2 u% P& Z& r& C
Clinical Pediatrics
9 X4 U# G6 Z( kVolume 46 Number 6# X) l$ B& Y! `/ y7 O9 Q# T. ~# z
July 2007 540-543
: `# b, u9 `; R1 ~' O5 J© 2007 Sage Publications' l6 ^9 ]4 \8 \) g" T& B
10.1177/0009922806296651
0 v0 N5 {* D4 v8 Qhttp://clp.sagepub.com: z4 |8 y% ] g+ E) _0 U
hosted at
3 q1 a. O Q; d0 D( L8 E3 H; b0 ahttp://online.sagepub.com" p# \9 L, n% w% \$ x- S
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
8 z, q9 Q2 s, t6 _' R" Z/ cis a significant concern for physicians. Central
4 l: _8 L& D4 Wprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
' L% Y+ S: B, Q- ]. C+ i* W2 r3 \4 Ythrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has/ r6 a. i6 d3 x- s2 E0 J
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
3 n$ ^' r) v6 ]5 z B, \lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
6 [0 M8 q- e' L; ^by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic% G( Y p' C" M
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
/ h8 a" N/ r+ Z7 gcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
/ ]. n, B2 T" E) [4 e8 Ireport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the9 B- j; N+ @$ u" K/ R, o) D6 M9 ^
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
) ~- Y) Q% y, E" T0 N6 N& Cment without testicular enlargement, which was due
" o0 H+ \3 {, {* o \to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by b7 ~5 p3 V5 B9 b i3 w
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-# X, D: f$ N, o' G% X
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
5 w" I2 U+ T8 i' \, M7 Ychild. Given the widespread and easy availability of. o4 }- z" T5 o$ y% ^) T
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-) U* q3 Z+ B, v$ G- p$ ?; Y4 X
bly more common than the rare case report in the
2 T% F! k6 @5 p) h; L$ _literature.4
( P @3 [+ I9 F/ k. pPatient Report. k& }9 ]$ l3 g" j1 w# g
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
: o) @6 O" w" U/ c5 d% eendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern' y2 f* V* F: r
of early sexual development. His mother noticed4 M/ g1 Q' a g6 y$ Q- W
light colored pubic hair development when he was8 ^( }1 [2 w2 U# a
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of8 E9 h9 s! `# @/ Z& |* a% u
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.% n3 _' U- C$ a; H
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
( q9 ]! D$ B# [9 C7 d% }7 vProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of% Y6 w: |0 S" d1 X
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;' L+ O" ]/ a- U3 F7 I; z/ t2 x0 Y, c; I
e-mail: [email protected].$ e& P. w; R% Z
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became% |; c1 h& l. e! r; m
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-* A+ b2 ^0 ^! x4 x5 c
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
* `( D9 q$ o. v5 T! }2 w+ Mwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
3 G. Q, i% W- g' s: q1 a; o6 I# Ta birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
% l3 f$ p/ d2 A2 q20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
8 X8 k% p# L' N6 b% Iof life and was still receiving breast milk along with
! k5 g5 w! o2 K) Rsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,1 N: z- l2 ^7 A. j; ~8 p
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development3 b/ P! H5 G' n) W
was age appropriate.8 f. O! R& }( _4 ?/ L4 d
The family history was remarkable for the father,1 z; r/ q& x7 _* f5 g; s
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,/ i$ m9 w' A, r8 T1 ~0 W
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s& L6 t) z) ?8 `$ j$ a1 b4 G* ~
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
5 X1 I. n' r' B9 R oearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.8 ~% t' r0 q6 }1 R
The father denied taking any other medication. The; Q7 u( u, w/ |2 m. F& | g9 h
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
3 a* l1 Q. s! R* `% Fwas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet2 }, e% r' T4 a" \0 u, u) B ]
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
$ b! Y+ x" n- ?6 Y2 O$ B6 ~0 |cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-; f2 D0 f! U5 ?0 k' a; @
tives. There were no siblings.: {- f8 h( o* k5 y
Physical Examination
s+ t/ u! f. @$ eThe physical examination revealed a very active,
* d' r1 c7 F% T, L! g9 D) Cplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented9 i. a* s/ G1 k/ {2 `; M; N# n \
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was" o, w) e: I2 m5 A2 b E _
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg; C2 H3 a- ]% m! Q
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
' G' W4 f9 ^+ h; `( e6 K0 q/ dvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of& w3 R5 V4 m, f( |3 a/ _5 ^. Z& v
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.9 I( K! _2 g$ h3 h8 q
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for2 z5 i( N7 |- H' L. [& [
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
& ]0 m. |$ s$ r4 I4 y8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well) I9 x2 `) p6 T( `
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
% u% C9 ]8 ]7 |, |% O+ m( l540
9 N9 }5 ~8 u! h7 lat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from# \) }- p9 v& f0 O, @: {
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
I# L: l$ g$ m% d' l/ u0 ]testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.0 Z4 F2 ]( }! k) C, _
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
3 C/ @$ j( h# d5 u- ~5 K0 eoily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
7 W! K3 Q ?' q, c {, l- Vabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
4 U1 N6 b4 `# d5 G8 _7 l& G' _Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
( v$ x/ l* Z5 t! z) O' Ubilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion, T& |8 \7 \. t% u2 p0 W
of papilledema.# l8 }& L1 _% i( ] H* Y
Laboratory Evaluation
1 g$ u2 z# H: v4 H3 K$ M3 {The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
# U$ m k% }1 K+ g5 V; Eusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-5 j. {* j2 O4 V/ B
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
5 J% M A2 G% t& C2 R# }karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test! w# O D& I$ K* \: J3 c2 E
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-( g$ X/ @2 f/ R. X8 R0 I, E+ c
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).' A: W& i1 v: c6 c( E- `
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
; Y8 @9 _. p% curea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were* A+ C0 t( E6 n5 z+ I: I
within normal range for his age. The concentration
9 H! ?" ~' [' W" _& }, L$ E. [# qof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
1 |- W) B: @: e. [: B8 _- U0 w(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20* [* E0 R7 n* {. S
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
0 ~: A4 Q- E N% \7 s" e$ [; P, Tterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
' b. a# A; X% Z9 _; z) X2 d- Hdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
' @9 K. O7 {% b49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
- K/ f% j2 R5 M9 `was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-4 f' C6 n3 W5 l, T* x
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
8 M. f0 Z' }' r" g/ @/ Y1 atestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),$ `% r i6 X; @& V6 I
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
4 f( D1 r5 X( s% r5 V. a4 z( m5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
) E* e# O6 b4 l/ i) q, b# ]stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
; p+ B: e& }; Q; d4 ]concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL" {/ J/ e* R# o9 r; i
(prepubertal).
' |7 i; [, v6 B2 c- J1 ^The parents were notified about the laboratory0 p. w+ x+ H) Q) {7 `. T1 T
results and were informed that all of the tests were$ `" [1 z8 r0 B; F/ e; h/ m
normal except the testosterone level was high. The1 ?) T* ~$ J$ M9 c# K# W8 a' _
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
# w6 P( H Q1 Iobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-4 |8 P* a+ ~) \5 R2 {9 H: g. c
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
! [6 z# x8 a* Y/ FPhysical examination at this time revealed that the
4 @* |9 ^+ r+ V. _! k7 }child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained6 r+ y. c7 j+ K' p
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
; M) [, u& R( Bunchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
( ~, K) b6 h. K, C Spletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
8 {0 W+ k- ?* ]0 L3 \1 k2 R$ sthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 27 a* j1 L; ?7 t+ d9 V# B s L
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.& T M' P& }) y- N
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-% q- o# y9 t) V$ Q. }& N3 f9 m7 u
ing frequent erections.# n1 \/ P2 `+ ^' a3 j9 H K- V/ `# z
Both parents were again questioned about use of) a* k7 I, k: Y& U% B' r
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to6 }( `! _; B N& x) Y" ~
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
6 C; H5 M4 t# sTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
" M7 N+ i* G# fuse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
8 m9 y+ \$ H g+ S; wing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
/ K. u+ I W% O0 g* _- ea year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed* e( I3 b0 Z, E% _0 N: U' q
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
$ I L7 ]0 ~. [. Dscribed by his family physician for decreased libido
. k* w6 i8 J# r5 k" o" Psecondary to depression.2 o, g2 f0 e! |. s6 Q
The child slept in the same bed with parents.1 N$ [- @7 a k( p' A
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
: t1 M) R3 m( r% r+ e# gchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-# c1 e# a! f" F2 I+ v! I& i
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
2 }8 s: J' e ]' O6 uThe father also admitted that after the phone call,/ v0 A# Q! [5 P E5 M2 o; _1 ^3 [( S
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby7 u; |, Y" _% h
was high, he then read the product information
: Y. j: Z4 |7 e8 X5 g0 _packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-. J6 X' ]4 \8 ~6 J' Q( J9 {
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they% a4 z; n0 t' O3 u
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
8 B2 v7 n; E0 Xfather was not hugging him with bare skin and had
' i8 ?( I! T8 [3 ]' `2 nbeen using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone! A; b& k1 z4 t0 D
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the) x& r# D$ G9 X- Y. [' {
laboratory to obtain the test.) W5 O; M1 Z" C" _+ ^$ J
Discussion
& c, e! w5 q4 e2 ^7 J0 E& c; |' }Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary! e- Z% u9 l) m8 \' _ a5 T
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
' k* [# l: \. P% k" W+ Z: T+ kPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when+ z$ g% R' d; S& S: J& {) U
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-7 E& `; `" @6 d3 b4 Y
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
; E9 N. o/ D0 [0 \6 _# cmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP/ `7 l( ?3 D5 t) Y& Y0 k/ S
may have a central nervous system lesion that is0 C. G0 z7 b8 K9 I+ P1 W
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-0 {6 ~8 t. W7 A/ ]7 q
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-$ @% x8 C2 _# w* W. \6 Z' S
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
) z H% e, f" h, @- vboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-; r. h0 e. @1 c+ z4 ]4 j1 d
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
6 E6 j8 a1 Z3 g9 `* urical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by8 C, V5 G! v% u
gonadotropins.1,30 p7 ?" C' M; H: U2 a: n1 o$ |
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
* { S6 ^4 g8 y7 j# Zcious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate' U! t/ q" x* `
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
. A, ~- Z7 u/ r5 l' L3 t3 ] Aexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-' y9 u A! G+ N7 B' T5 Q! {' Z2 S
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing8 O& t+ K% c% J) B! \/ U6 i
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
4 B* I4 l4 q2 J) V; p4 u4 O3 Aadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious" o/ p1 G) a0 U4 J; L1 s# @
puberty in boys.3,4; Q. Z7 ?7 T4 J, I
The most common form of congenital adrenal9 C4 e% I' M8 [8 T
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency., w: q7 M. m/ R' }) b
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in5 r& s+ C- \0 e* u
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,' j% {6 j! c' Q* o
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
, T8 v4 I! u" Oexcess.1,3( {) W2 ^. C) z4 B( Q6 s" R2 o
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from ]# d. I5 `" ~ p
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
" G0 m' |/ K' M" OA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-+ x5 }8 O! X% X5 i; L+ A0 W
independent precocious puberty, which is also known+ h. z7 n$ l# [$ S1 O Q( u5 S; j
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a; ^( c$ U/ Z, Z# Y& e
very young age. The physical findings in these boys1 Y+ B/ l" v3 Q- b8 R0 S
with this disorder are full pubertal development,- }) R8 Y. ?9 K5 Y9 q( K7 {) M
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys+ p; H# }+ _; x2 W/ K$ x" j
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder7 ~0 P. p/ H* m- ]7 Y
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show2 h; `' T8 M0 j: ~" v" K/ I
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-' Z* u: m( g9 c& Z& ]- ?
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
$ }' @! n7 O, y9 |+ R$ vautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
6 M' ]8 a& D4 |! f+ a0 E- _$ mmales; therefore, other male members of the family; y8 G3 F9 N, n c) z1 n1 n
may have similar precocious puberty.3
- g9 Y& o+ L! P: k2 s7 D' pIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
" X' W4 u8 f8 G; N0 x* t; ^sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
1 O& o; n* {, f' h3 T" Mcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
8 [/ j; {1 e" ]8 ]" mwas in the differential diagnosis because his father
$ D# N" S1 J) P9 G4 m: Ystarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,7 w q! s! H R! t+ P
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the1 L9 t, P9 }9 C/ I6 o0 K' r
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
; [( N) Q8 F$ P1 ~" C0 I, Dative initial history of androgen exposure, our1 q0 {4 ~% R K. @
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia," U# ?5 V2 s7 E ]
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase3 V6 v3 P' V# n
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
; Y- S7 o& k9 M# r! K! Y3 B' Ring the normal level of adrenal steroids.
, N: W# ]* T0 G5 E9 P: BThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly2 T# D7 G7 M- z0 x+ ~
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because) R) Z8 d) N1 L4 n
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
+ H; w3 q( a1 N( e; vpearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
0 ?+ [6 G8 K- Fdecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
; `9 s Q; I G4 Tterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
/ m( ` s8 Y9 I9 |, ?# F# y' J2 uusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
9 i7 u6 u2 H* |& mDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or$ V! J$ x% z/ }4 {0 t- I
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
4 t7 ~& c% p3 N2 C4 y$ Lunprotected females through direct skin exposure.
9 H2 W/ m c& n" RSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
- F7 i5 S) i% q: o/ }; I1 {! mbaseline value in those females who were exposed to7 V( I# Z! v- e( P0 B# ^) s, B: \
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male7 M: }5 B9 J! e7 F
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
" N! {" t+ {' z8 ~- ~* f. ption site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
# C R2 |' l% ` j2 H* N- J+ UOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,9 a: `$ c& Y( }# {+ p$ \, z: f
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that5 v. v* g# t% t, J' H; o3 n
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-, b4 k0 ]. G- h1 z J/ J
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
# V: x* r; U% o, Q3 Y9 H9 ?! _active in young children exposed to testosterone# Q' j+ P, H. E, V7 H' d/ }& v# z$ |
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-4 Q3 g( u x) O: Y
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
: ~- Q' t$ O) pvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in6 G2 j2 W1 I0 }' y& _/ E& d
children results in an increase in growth velocity and& S I/ w% [: g
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.! G6 f- N. {' P/ o- Q
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during3 B" `1 H% u1 Y
early childhood on pubertal development and final& ~% w M7 g& R& B' m0 z9 I* }3 D
adult height are not fully known and always remain
+ [& s! ]; j2 I# k: ba concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
! g9 X- z7 {5 ^" eterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
( I. K# O5 V3 Facceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
, j2 e" S+ D9 Q% _cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
, Q4 e# h9 D6 v% U1 ~% V0 O1 Jdecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
. v! N# ^: [; J! L6 g! v) TThere are conflicting reports and controversy
' M3 r. C& P; Y" iover the effect of early androgen exposure on adult1 m+ P- A+ ]) i+ B
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal+ e4 {. A! b+ b2 J/ L; C; f+ Q
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
# m( V! q# K+ {" c% P5 L' @4 fulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,& H4 m3 x! f; u0 @+ b- _
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
& A! L# Y% H6 ~' F E( {; z P, vchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
% g' m9 ]) e g$ Ppenile length in clinical studies.4 T6 c+ w' B! G
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is' F. g9 ?% ]0 t2 \' F* A
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
, F% Y' \% Q! } N1 v0 Z$ Atestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
9 w$ I' z' m5 C9 k6 s! Q9 m( f- b2 dthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time. L# \( K# _% L* i: [1 L
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of, e E# F9 f# r* J: V* A
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
; G8 j2 @% U8 qthe follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
* a4 x% ?0 e+ p* m$ X5 w4 {height will not be affected.6 X: b7 }( J3 e: H- P
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-
, _2 y: d& G* b! e; [7 P( Pability of androgen products in our society may
1 V6 T9 V/ ]! |" o2 S5 _! rindeed cause more virilization in male or female
0 y6 J' P- e; r9 Uchildren than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
. }% q. s( y) pgen products must be considered and specific ques-
6 u7 F# t, ^4 B! W* utioning about the use of a testosterone product or3 c( G% w/ u( Q$ A2 i0 Z8 L
gel should be asked of the family members during4 f* a7 L9 J. c
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-/ D4 \1 F) Z9 }2 P# x1 \% R
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
" w! N7 S. \% Y0 j+ Cnosis can be established by just a few tests and by
+ i# T- a6 ~/ G" `. yappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a9 z% ~9 v# s" e3 \# C
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may# O- Y( K% V9 X( p& e+ b; H& G: M
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive. O0 o W" a$ H# H1 S+ Y3 P
investigation. The primary care physician should be
( F6 k( {# j; z8 P) saware of this fact, because most of these children' e3 r& n. z; m- S. R' y
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’3 N) [1 C% Q' \
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a
7 {+ H, ]. |" K" N4 l3 G2 zwarning about the virilizing effect on a male or/ }! \& S5 \3 T& A5 S7 [1 n; `
female child who might come in contact with some-
$ h" s6 [4 Y' aone using any of these products.
, J3 @7 m& Q4 u" Z" NReferences
T" Z' D3 M2 F% Z, D4 {0 H4 Y9 Z# I1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
9 e7 J, F1 E' s' _3 C" p+ s- oand puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
! M/ V9 e# v. z$ A0 o4 {' wEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;4 I3 w3 l" F0 J$ y9 {
2002: 565-628.1 S; k% k8 t9 B' `
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
. `# T) K- g0 Rpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|